User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
You continue to disappoint me. At least you rated this time, and not 'ugly' for a change.
But PLEASE... enlighten us. Disappointing HOW, specifically?
For me, those are easily four-star feet. They would probably be five-star but for the pronounced Morton's Toe (short great to aka LONG second toe), which I don't like but most guys here love. It's most visible in #2234061 & 2234000 but is easily disguised and 'evens out' in most high-heel pics. Other than that, the overall foot/toes shape is quite aesthetically pleasing (#2233973). Based on #2233996, 2234020 & others, she has a beautiful and graceful as well as reasonably high arch. Her size isn't available (I checked) but she appears to be in the ideal Size 6-8 range, probably about a 7 or 7½ by my best guess. Her feet are very well cared for, smooth and always perfectly pedicured, with a decent nail shape and symmetry (#2234063). Her shoe game is crazy sexy-- most styles are very sexy high stiletto heels, very colorful, and often open-toe or sandals, yet she isn't stuck on one style type, which means she's adventurous and confident.
"Women in revealing, high-heeled sandals are more likely to be confident naked than women in closed-toe heels,” Masini says. “You can tell a lot about how a woman grooms the rest of her body by how she takes care of her feet. If there’s a neat, sexy pedicure going on, expect neat and sexy grooming elsewhere. No pedicure? No grooming elsewhere.”
But you're right about one thing... she is a beautiful girl both above AND below the ankles. Ever since you showed up on this website, you've just been a nitpicky nitwit about feet, or have some warped sense of taste. Maybe Oprah & Mama June Shannon are more your taste?
Your turn, Slick... tell us what's so 'disappointing' to you about these feet?